Bone Abstracts

Background: There are no models for estimating risk of fracture in patients taking treatments for osteoporosis. Knowing a patient’s risk of fracture during treatment may help make future treatment decisions; therefore, the development of on-treatment fracture risk models is needed.Methods: To assess on-treatment fracture risk, the analysis included subjects who received denosumab (DMAb) 60 mg Q6 every 6 months for at least 1 year in either FREEDOM o...

Denosumab subcutaneous administration every 6 months reduced the incidence of new fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis by 68% at the spine and 40% at the hip over 36 months compared with placebo in the FREEDOM study (Cummings et al., NEJM, 2009:361:756). This efficacy was supported by differential improvements from baseline in vertebral and femoral strength at 36 months (18.2 and 8.6%, respectively) estimated by an established voxel-based finit...

see PP354....

Bone strength is influenced by cortical thickness, area, mass and porosity, all of which contribute to nonvertebral fracture risk. Cortical porosity is one parameter of structural decay associated with bone fragility. This is caused by unbalanced and accelerated remodelling of Haversian units which enlarge, coalesce and fragment the cortex. Antiresorptive therapies will limit progression of cortical porosity; reducing existing porosity would be a goal for those already at incr...

Low fracture (FX) incidence has been demonstrated in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) treated with DMAb for up to 10 years in the FREEDOM extension [Bone ASBMR 2015]. Bone biopsy-based assessment of DMAb’s effects at the tissue level has demonstrated a low remodelling rate consistent with DMAb’s mechanism of action (Reid JBMR 2010; Brown JBMR 2014). From FREEDOM, we report the effects of DMAb on bone matrix mineralization in women who un...